2026 has got off to a flying start. As I write this to you, we find ourselves moving into March, and if we thought that the new year would bring clarity to what has been a volatile and confusing world, we were sadly mistaken.
At the time of writing, there are numerous areas of uncertainty both locally and abroad:
On the South African side of things we are seeing a welcome tail wind from a resurgent Rand and a strong JSE. Undoubtedly, there are some green shoots to be seen in South Africa. We are off the grey list, electricity supply is less of an issue (although the pricing thereof remains challenging), inflation is under control, we have seen some positive developments with ports and Transnet, and we are likely to see enhanced tax revenue on the back of high resource prices and consequently a less pressured budget. A massive infrastructure project is set to be unleashed (cynically one can’t help fearing that this will just be another feeding trough for the corruption that has crippled our country).
That said, we need to be careful of assuming that these tail winds are of our own doing and that they are sustainable.
Much of the strength of the ZAR has to do with the unprecedented weakness of the USD, and much of the strength of the JSE is as a result of higher gold and platinum prices and resurgence of the Chinese stock market (which influences the value of Naspers through its holding in Tencent). We have also seen a dearth of volatility in global markets in the last 10 months – we shouldn’t forget though, that when we saw meaningful volatility in April of last year, the ZAR nearly touched R20/USD. SA has yet to solve its anaemic growth challenge – much of which can be attributed to the government doggedly sticking to (and even doubling down) on policies which clearly haven’t worked. Add to this the upcoming succession challenges that the ANC and consequently South Africa faces, and it is not possible to claim that South Africa is out of the woods.
And then we have the US.
Whatever one’s views on President Trump are, one thing that is not controversial is that he is a divisive character, and it seems the world and markets have got to a position of seeing the US in binary terms – very good or very bad.
Currently there seems to be a huge level of pessimism on the US and the Dollar, and much of this is linked to a single personality. Perhaps this is deserved – his approach of being an (unpredictable) iron fist without a velvet glove has resulted in markets playing the man, and not the ball, so to speak. If one looks at the US, is it as bad as is being made out? Economic growth is strong (materially higher than Europe or the UK), inflation is virtually back at target, interest rates have fallen, democratic institutions have stood up to political pressure (think the FED on interest rates and recent supreme court rulings), and employment is solid (there has been job shedding in the federal workforce but the private sector has seen good numbers). And more importantly, the US economy is at the cutting edge of the technical and AI revolution that we are seeing. Love him or hate, Trump will be constrained by the mid-term elections and gone in under 3 years. It is entirely possible that we are at the point of maximum pessimism on the dollar, and we should be careful of being too quick to bet on its demise. It could be a costly mistake.
Perhaps the divided nature of where the world finds itself has lead to binary positioning, and this is exactly what we should avoid.
Perhaps the divided nature of where the world finds itself has lead to binary positioning, and this is exactly what we should avoid. Whether it is asset class positioning, stock selection, or geographical allocation and currency exposure, nuance and diversification will be key.